Whether There is a Moral Obligation to Disobey the Coercive Mandates by Douglas Farrow

 Whether There is a Moral Obligation to Disobey the Coercive Mandates by Douglas Farrow

This makes the question of authority a very pressing one, in the Church as in the State. To appeal once more to the Catechism, “authority does not derive its moral legitimacy from itself” and “must not behave in a despotic manner, but must act for the common good as a ‘moral force based on freedom and a sense of responsibility’” (1902). “Authority is exercised legitimately only when it seeks the common good of the group concerned and if it employs morally licit means to attain it. If rulers were to enact unjust laws or take measures contrary to the moral order, such arrangements would not be binding in conscience. In such a case, ‘authority breaks down completely and results in shameful abuse’” (1903).

Written in the style of Aquinas' Summa Theologica, Farrow uses the same logic to advocate for the moral obligation to disobey the Covid mandates. He quotes Aquinas saying, “a human law has the character of law to the extent that it accords with right reason, and thus derives from the eternal law. Insofar as it falls short of right reason it is said to be an unjust law, and thus has not so much the nature of law as of a kind of violence.”