The Fickle ‘Science’ of Lockdowns by Phillip W. Magness and Peter C. Earle
So why did public-health authorities abandon their opposition to lockdowns? Why did they rush to embrace the untested claims of flawed epidemiological modeling? One answer appears in the Johns Hopkins study from 2019: “Some NPIs, such as travel restrictions and quarantine, might be pursued for social or political purposes by political leaders, rather than pursued because of public health evidence.”
Our "experts" panicked. They did what is best for them. Effectiveness against Covid was never a concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment